Between Relativism and Reproach: Exploring Value Judgements about Good Human Lives within Theologically Engaged Anthropology This current phase of CTEA's academic mission delves directly into an assessment of more normative and transformative frameworks for analysis. While both theology and anthropology have explored the concept of good human lives, a collaborative approach is urgently needed to tackle the analytical challenges posed by relativism, which can devolve into amoral nihilism, and judgmentalism, which risks becoming moralistic reproach. By combining theological insights with anthropological methodologies, this project seeks to establish a robust framework for assessing religious doctrines and practices in ways that meaningfully contribute to living good human lives. A key objective is to explore definitional criteria for good human lives that remain attentive to cultural and theological particularities while resisting reductive universalism. Through these discussions, anthropologists will gain tools to critically navigate cultural relativism and judgmentalism, while theologians will be encouraged to bridge the gap between professed faith and lived experience, ensuring their contributions are both reflective and practical. By integrating theological and anthropological perspectives, the project aims to provide actionable insights that can positively influence good human living across diverse cultural and religious contexts. The project’s outputs will include an edited book, a special journal issue, podcasts, and conference presentations to share the resulting framework designed to inform both academic inquiry and practical applications.
